Meaning
Interpretive paths separate when participants tell different stories about a shared experience. A narrative divergence becomes a record of the factual gap that grows between founders over several years. It marks the point where a shared vision splits into two personal histories.
Story Drift
Incremental changes in how an event is described lead to a total loss of common ground. Evidence of narrative divergence often appears in the small details of a deal that one person ignores while the other emphasizes. These changes happen slowly through repeated retellings to new staff or investors.
Logic Gap
Internal consistency within a single story does not prove its accuracy against the other side. Detecting narrative divergence requires a third party to compare the two stories against a dated document. The gap shows where memory has replaced the record.
This process identifies the specific points where a participant changed their account to fit a new situation. Such changes often occur when the original agreement no longer matches the current interests of a party.
Cohesion Risk
Trust breaks down when two people no longer agree on what happened in the past. If narrative divergence is left unaddressed, it creates a friction that slows every new decision. The record is the only tool that can bridge this distance.