Meaning
Contractual obligations regarding the transfer of equity exist even if they are not captured in a written document. These oral securities agreements rely on the mutual understanding and verbal promises of the participants at the time of a transaction. The law often views these as binding if the parties have acted as though a contract existed.
Enforceability Threshold
Validity of a verbal promise depends on the specifics of the jurisdiction and the nature of the claim. In many cases, oral securities agreements are hard to enforce because they lack the detail found in a standard stock purchase agreement. A claimant must provide clear and convincing evidence that a meeting of the minds occurred.
Memory Conflict
Disagreements often stem from different recollections of the same conversation. One person might remember a firm offer of equity, while the other recalls a conditional promise based on future performance. These gaps in memory become expensive disputes when the firm is successful.
The passage of time usually widens the difference between these two accounts, making a mutual resolution less likely without external intervention.
Litigation Risk
Cost of defending against a claim based on a verbal promise is substantial. Without a written record, the case often proceeds to a hearing where a moderator must decide who is more credible. This uncertainty can derail a funding round or a merger.
A founder who relies on oral securities agreements faces a high probability of future legal challenges.